Peer Review isn’t the TSA: Let’s Humanize It in the Name of Science

Public deification of some infallible abstraction called “science” does a disservice to real science.

What’s needed is not only more and better scientific studies, but also a renewed understanding of how knowledge is built.

From the headlines proclaiming a state of “crisis” in both social science research and scientific peer review, it might well seem that the lyrics from a Weird Al song have come to pass: “All you need to understand is everything you know is wrong!” Or, as the inimitable Mike Pesca put it on his podcast The Gist, “An interesting new study reveals that most studies aren’t interesting, or new, or particularly revealing.” Continue reading →

The Fault in Our Stats

Noting the Social Aspects of Racial Identity in Genetic Research is Vital to Improving Healthcare

In a recent New York Times article, “Tales of African-American Identity Found in DNA,” Carl Zimmer explains that new genetic research on individuals identifying as African American confirms historical accounts and provides new details about a past that was often not recorded. It’s exciting to see that scientists are following a larger trend that can be observed in any number of fields (from genetics to history to literature), which involves an epidemiological correction, a shifting of the predominant focus of study away from males of European descent as if they were representative of the whole species. Continue reading →

What is Vital? Join us!

Vital is a new magazine dedicated to the “human side of health.”

What we mean by this is that our staff of writers and researchers thinks about science, medicine, and the human experience from a social and cultural perspective. We ask questions meant to provoke new questions. We want to know what ideas, perspectives, approaches, and solutions all of us might be missing out on by looking for answers in the same old places. Continue reading →