On a brisk February morning in 2014, Dan Nuzzo woke up gasping for air. His heart was racing and he could no longer sleep. That moment, Dan explained, was his “lowest point” since his diagnosis of multiple sclerosis two years before. Indeed, at this time, his symptoms were so severe that he postponed his physical therapy training for a second time. Continue reading →
Sometimes headlines tout conclusiveness when that’s not exactly how science works. Can we foster a public perception more open to the fact that medical guidelines evolve as information changes?
There has been one confirmed case of Zika virus death in the United States and its territories. We know this thanks to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), which provides nuanced data that can help policymakers predict and respond to threats to public health.
More than one person has died from gun shots this year, but detailed statistics have been unavailable for more than 20 years, thanks to Congress. Continue reading →
Public deification of some infallible abstraction called “science” does a disservice to real science.
What’s needed is not only more and better scientific studies, but also a renewed understanding of how knowledge is built.
From the headlines proclaiming a state of “crisis” in both social science research and scientific peer review, it might well seem that the lyrics from a Weird Al song have come to pass: “All you need to understand is everything you know is wrong!” Or, as the inimitable Mike Pesca put it on his podcast The Gist, “An interesting new study reveals that most studies aren’t interesting, or new, or particularly revealing.” Continue reading →
Noting the Social Aspects of Racial Identity in Genetic Research is Vital to Improving Healthcare
In a recent New York Times article, “Tales of African-American Identity Found in DNA,” Carl Zimmer explains that new genetic research on individuals identifying as African American confirms historical accounts and provides new details about a past that was often not recorded. It’s exciting to see that scientists are following a larger trend that can be observed in any number of fields (from genetics to history to literature), which involves an epidemiological correction, a shifting of the predominant focus of study away from males of European descent as if they were representative of the whole species. Continue reading →
Vital is a new magazine dedicated to the “human side of health.”
What we mean by this is that our staff of writers and researchers thinks about science, medicine, and the human experience from a social and cultural perspective. We ask questions meant to provoke new questions. We want to know what ideas, perspectives, approaches, and solutions all of us might be missing out on by looking for answers in the same old places. Continue reading →